There was recently
an article in the Los Angeles Times about guns being used by Los Angeles County
sheriff’s deputies frequently going off by accident. Among other incidents, a deputy shot himself
in the leg while pulling his gun out to confront a suspect, another shot a
bullet through a wall when he stumbled over a stroller and another
was paralyzed when his 3-year-old son was playing with his
father’s gun and accidently shot him.
These accidental
shootings have more doubled in 2 years.
In this time, the department has begun using a new gun, a Smith $ Wesson
M&P, which doesn’t have a safety lock and requires less pressure to pull
the trigger. Officials argue that not
only does this save time when a deputy needs to act immediately but also that
having these guns that are easier to shoot will help the department get more
women on the force. There have been
complaints that there aren’t enough female deputies, and it has been noted that
many female recruits fail, because they have a hard time pulling the trigger.
Look, if a woman
has difficulty handling a gun, maybe she shouldn’t be a cop. This may be an impolitic, sexist thing to
say, but guns shouldn’t be super easy to shoot.
They shouldn’t be so easy to shoot that a 3-year-old can shoot one, even
if it does help women.
The next day in the
Times, there was an article in the Times about “smart” guns, like the
German-made Armatix iP1 which can be fired only if its user is wearing a
wireless wristband that broadcasts on a specific frequency. Another such gun will only fire if it
recognizes specific thumb prints. These
guns, which incorporate technology, can’t be used, for example, by someone who
steals them or by a child who comes across them in the house – a good
thing.
But guess
what? These guns aren’t available in the
U.S. Why? Because, although many American
gun owners back such technological safety measures, hard-core gun enthusiasts
have fought against them, including by boycotting American companies when they
put out such guns. What these folks,
backed by the all-powerful N.R.A, argue is that these technological safety
measures are another way for the government to control and ultimately take away
their guns.
This
is crazy, yes, but is it any crazier than gun control laws being loosened
instead of increased after the elementary school shooting in Newtown,
Connecticut – and people then buying more guns in case gun control laws became
popular again (or, as was argued, the government decided to “take our guns away”)?
And I really wonder if anything will be done in terms of gun control after the
Bible study shooting at the church in Charleston, S.C, this week. We cry out for safety, but we really rather
be able to shoot.