Two weekends ago, I
saw Happy Days, Samuel Beckett’s play about Winnie who is buried up to her
breasts in Act 1 and up to her neck in Act 2 and how she cheerfully makes the
best of a horrifying situation, as her death literally engulfs her, with
minimal companionship and assistance from her grunting partner, Willie. I had
read the play in college and had always wanted to see how it was done on stage,
and it was a real treat to see this fine production at the Theater at Boston
Court in Pasadena that featured a stunningly realistic portrayal of Winnie by
Brooke Adams.
Seeing the production
brought up a couple memories.
I had read the play
when I took a course on Beckett, in which we read nearly if not all of his
works. By the end of the quarter, I
found myself thinking like a blabbering idiot, my thoughts taking the form of
rants and mumblings with constantly repeated phrases and circular
reasoning. It was not unlike when I took
a course on Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene and ended up thinking in
rhymes.
Some years earlier,
when my family was living in London for a year, I read Waiting for Godot in
school and gave it to my mom after I was done.
When she read it, she was furious!
She couldn’t understand why
Beckett had written it and kept asking me, with considerable bitterness, “What
does it mean?” outraged that there was no resolution, no Godot, at the
end. Which was exactly Beckett’s
point.
Also, I happened to
see Pomona College’s production of Chekhov’s Uncle Vanya a few weeks ago. I had never seen or read the play. At the risk of sounding ignorant, it really
struck me that Chekhov really wasn’t that far from Beckett and the theater of
the absurd, with his characters going on about how miserable they are and how
they have to endure, albeit in a more conventional setting. (I also loved having seen Durang’s Chekhov
take-off, Vanya, Sonia, Mosha and Spike, earlier this year at the Mark Taper
Forum.)
No comments:
Post a Comment